Lietuviškai
           THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF           
                            LITHUANIA                            

                            DECISION                             
        ON THE PETITION OF THE VILNIUS REGIONAL COURT,THE        
         PETITIONER, TO INVESTIGATE WHETHER PRESIDENT OF         
        THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA DECREE NO. 164 "ON THE         
       DISMISSAL OF JUDGES OF LOCAL COURTS AND PRESIDENTS        
        OF COURTS" OF 22 JULY 2003 TO THE EXTENT THAT IT         
         PROVIDES THAT PALMIRA LINKEVIČIENĖ IS DISMISSED         
         FROM THE OFFICE OF A JUDGE OF THE BIRŽAI LOCAL          
        DISTRICT COURT AS WELL AS FROM THE OFFICE OF THE         
       PRESIDENT OF THE SAME COURT IS NOT IN CONFLICT, AS        
        TO ITS CONTENT AND THE PROCEDURE OF THE ADOPTION         
       ESTABLISHED IN THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF        
        LITHUANIA, WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC         
          OF LITHUANIA, THE PROVISIONS OF THE EUROPEAN           
        CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND        
        FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS AND THOSE OF THE REPUBLIC OF        
        LITHUANIA LAW ON COURTS, AND WHETHER PARAGRAPH 8         
        OF ARTICLE 90 OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA LAW ON        
         COURTS IS NOT IN CONFLICT WITH THE CONSTITUTION         
        AND THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF        
              HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS              

                          7 April 2004                           
                             Vilnius                             

     The  Constitutional  Court  of  the  Republic  of Lithuania,
composed  of  the  Justices  of  the Constitutional Court Armanas
Abramavičius,   Egidijus  Jarašiūnas,  Egidijus  Kūris,  Kęstutis
Lapinskas,   Zenonas   Namavičius,  Augustinas  Normantas,  Jonas
Prapiestis, Vytautas Sinkevičius, and Stasys Stačiokas,
     with the secretary of the hearing-Daiva Pitrėnaitė,
     in  the  procedural  sitting  of  the  Constitutional  Court
considered   the   petition   of   the   Vilnius  Regional  Court
requesting  to  investigate "whether President of the Republic of
Lithuania  Decree  No.  164  "On the Dismissal of Judges of Local
Courts  and  Presidents  of Courts" of 22 July 2003 to the extent
that  it  provides  that  Palmira  Linkevičienė is dismissed from
the  office  of  a  judge  of  the Biržai Local District Court as
well  as  from  the  office  of  the  President of the same court
subsequent  to  Item  5 of Article 115 of the Constitution of the
Republic  of  Lithuania is not in conflict, as to its content and
the  procedure  of  the  adoption established in the Constitution
of  the  Republic  of  Lithuania,  with  the principles of a just
civil  society  and  state  under  the  rule  of  law  which  are
entrenched  in  the  Preamble to the Constitution of the Republic
of  Lithuania,  Paragraph  1  of  Article 29 of the Constitution,
consolidating  the  principle  of  equality of all persons before
the  law,  Paragraph  1  of  Article  31  of the Constitution and
Paragraph  2  of  Article  6  of  the European Convention for the
Protection    of   Human   Rights   and   Fundamental   Freedoms,
consolidating  the  principle  of the presumption of innocence of
the  person,  Article  155 of the Constitution to the extent that
judges  are  dismissed  under  procedure established by law, also
the  procedure  established  in Articles 83, 84, 85, Paragraphs 6
and  7  of Article 90 of the Republic of Lithuania Law on Courts;
whether  Paragraph  8  of Article 90 of the Republic of Lithuania
Law  on  Courts  is  in compliance with Paragraph 2 of Article 31
of  the  Constitution  and  Paragraph  1  of  Article  6  of  the
European  Convention  for  the  Protection  of  Human  Rights and
Fundamental  Freedoms,  consolidating  the right of the person to
an  impartial  court, and with the principle of a state under the
rule of law entrenched in the Preamble to the Constitution".

     The Constitutional Court
                        has established:                         

     The    Vilnius   Regional   Court,   the   petitioner,   was
investigating  a  civil  case.  By its ruling of 9 March 2004, it
suspended  the  consideration  of  the  case  and  applied to the
Constitutional  Court  with  a petition requesting to investigate
"whether  President  of  the Republic of Lithuania Decree No. 164
"On  the  Dismissal  of  Judges of Local Courts and Presidents of
Courts"  of  22  July  2003  to  the extent that it provides that
Palmira  Linkevičienė  is dismissed from the office of a judge of
the  Biržai  Local  District  Court as well as from the office of
the  President  of the same court subsequent to Item 5 of Article
115  of  the  Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania is not in
conflict,  as  to  its  content and the procedure of the adoption
established  in  the  Constitution  of the Republic of Lithuania,
with  the  principles of a just civil society and state under the
rule  of  law  which  are  entrenched  in  the  Preamble  to  the
Constitution  of  the  Republic  of  Lithuania,  Paragraph  1  of
Article  29  of  the Constitution, consolidating the principle of
equality  of  all  persons before the law, Paragraph 1 of Article
31  of  the  Constitution  and  Paragraph  2  of Article 6 of the
European  Convention  for  the  Protection  of  Human  Rights and
Fundamental   Freedoms,   consolidating   the  principle  of  the
presumption  of  innocence  of  the  person,  Article  155 of the
Constitution  to  the  extent  that  judges  are  dismissed under
procedure  established  by law, also the procedure established in
Articles  83,  84,  85,  Paragraphs  6 and 7 of Article 90 of the
Republic  of  Lithuania  Law  on  Courts;  whether Paragraph 8 of
Article  90  of  the  Republic  of  Lithuania Law on Courts is in
compliance  with  Paragraph  2  of Article 31 of the Constitution
and  Paragraph  1 of Article 6 of the European Convention for the
Protection    of   Human   Rights   and   Fundamental   Freedoms,
consolidating  the  right  of  the  person to an impartial court,
and  with  the  principle  of  a  state  under  the  rule  of law
entrenched in the Preamble to the Constitution".

     The Constitutional Court
                           holds that:                           

     1.  Under  Paragraph  1  of Article 102 of the Constitution,
the  Constitutional  Court  shall  decide  whether  the  laws and
other   acts   of  the  Seimas  are  not  in  conflict  with  the
Constitution  and  whether  acts of the President of the Republic
and  the  Government are not in conflict with the Constitution or
laws.
     2.   Paragraph   3   of  Article  138  of  the  Constitution
provides:
     "International  treaties  which  are  ratified by the Seimas
of  the  Republic of Lithuania shall be a constituent part of the
legal system of the Republic of Lithuania."
     While  construing  this  provision  of the Constitution, the
Constitutional  Court  has  held  that it means that the treaties
ratified   by   the   Seimas   acquire   the  power  of  the  law
(Constitutional Court ruling of 17 October 1995).
     Under  the  Constitution,  the Constitutional Court does not
investigate  the  compliance  of  a  law  with  an act having the
power  of  the  law  (Constitutional  Court  decision of 25 April
2002).

     Conforming  to  Article  28  and  Item  2  of Paragraph 1 of
Article  69  of  the  Law  on  the  Constitutional  Court  of the
Republic  of  Lithuania, the Constitutional Court of the Republic
of Lithuania has adopted the following

                            decision:                            

     1.  To  accept  the  petition  of the Vilnius Regional Court
requesting  to  investigate  whether President of the Republic of
Lithuania  Decree  No.  164  "On the Dismissal of Judges of Local
Courts  and  Presidents  of Courts" of 22 July 2003 to the extent
that  it  provides  that  Palmira  Linkevičienė is dismissed from
the  office  of  a  judge  of  the Biržai Local District Court as
well  as  from  the  office  of  the  President of the same court
subsequent  to  Item  5 of Article 115 of the Constitution of the
Republic  of  Lithuania is not in conflict, as to its content and
the  procedure  of  the  adoption established in the Constitution
of  the  Republic  of  Lithuania,  with  the principles of a just
civil  society  and  state  under  the  rule  of  law  which  are
entrenched  in  the  Preamble to the Constitution of the Republic
of  Lithuania,  Paragraph 1 of Article 29, Paragraph 1 of Article
31  of  the  Constitution,  Paragraph  2  of  Article  6  of  the
European  Convention  for  the  Protection  of  Human  Rights and
Fundamental  Freedoms,  Article  155  of  the  Constitution,  and
Articles  83,  84,  85,  Paragraphs  6 and 7 of Article 90 of the
Republic  of  Lithuania  Law  on Courts, also whether Paragraph 8
of  Article  90 of the Republic of Lithuania Law on Courts is not
in  conflict  with  Paragraph 2 of Article 31 of the Constitution
and  the  principle  of  a state under the rule of law entrenched
in the Preamble to the Constitution.
     2.  To  refuse  to  consider  the  petition  of  the Vilnius
Regional  Court  requesting to investigate whether Paragraph 8 of
Article  90  of  the  Republic  of  Lithuania Law on Courts is in
compliance  with  Paragraph  1  of  Article  6  of  the  European
Convention  for  the  Protection  of Human Rights and Fundamental
Freedoms.

Justices of the Constitutional Court:	Armanas Abramavičius
					Egidijus Jarašiūnas
					Egidijus Kūris
					Kęstutis Lapinskas
					Zenonas Namavičius
					Augustinas Normantas
					Jonas Prapiestis
					Vytautas Sinkevičius
					Stasys Stačiokas