Lietuviškai
           THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF           
                            LITHUANIA                            

                            DECISION                             
         ON THE PETITION SET FORTH IN THE 16 MARCH 2004          
              RESOLUTION "ON THE APPLICATION TO THE              
        CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA        
        WITH A PETITION REQUESTING TO INVESTIGATE WHETHER        
         THE DECREE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC 'ON         
        THE PROPOSAL TO INSTITUTE IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDINGS        
        AGAINST THE MEMBER OF THE SEIMAS OF THE REPUBLIC         
           OF LITHUANIA ARTŪRAS PAULAUSKAS' IS NOT IN            
        CONFLICT WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF        
           LITHUANIA" OF THE SEIMAS OF THE REPUBLIC OF           
       LITHUANIA REQUESTING TO INVESTIGATE WHETHER DECREE        
        OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC NO. 397 "ON THE         
          PROPOSAL TO INSTITUTE IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDINGS          
        AGAINST THE MEMBER OF THE SEIMAS OF THE REPUBLIC         
        OF LITHUANIA ARTŪRAS PAULAUSKAS" OF 12 MARCH 2004        
         IS NOT IN CONFLICT WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE         
                      REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA                      

                          17 March 2004                          
                             Vilnius                             

     The  Constitutional  Court  of  the  Republic  of Lithuania,
composed  of  the  Justices  of  the Constitutional Court Armanas
Abramavičius,   Egidijus  Jarašiūnas,  Egidijus  Kūris,  Kęstutis
Lapinskas,   Zenonas   Namavičius,  Augustinas  Normantas,  Jonas
Prapiestis, Vytautas Sinkevičius, and Stasys Stačiokas,
     with the secretary of the hearing-Daiva Pitrėnaitė,
     in  the  procedural  sitting  of  the  Constitutional  Court
considered  the  16  March 2004 Resolution "On the Application to
the  Constitutional  Court  of  the  Republic of Lithuania with a
Petition  Requesting  to  investigate  whether  the Decree of the
President   of   the  Republic  'On  the  Proposal  to  Institute
Impeachment  Proceedings  Against the Member of the Seimas of the
Republic  of  Lithuania  Artūras  Paulauskas'  Is Not in Conflict
with  the  Constitution  of  the  Republic  of  Lithuania" of the
Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania, the petitioner.

     The Constitutional Court
                        has established:                         

     1.  On  16  March  2004,  the  Seimas  of  the  Republic  of
Lithuania,   the  petitioner,  adopted  the  Resolution  "On  the
Application  to  the  Constitutional  Court  of  the  Republic of
Lithuania  with  a Petition Requesting to investigate whether the
Decree  of  the  President  of  the  Republic 'On the Proposal to
Institute  Impeachment  Proceedings  Against  the  Member  of the
Seimas  of  the  Republic of Lithuania Artūras Paulauskas' Is Not
in   Conflict   with   the   Constitution   of  the  Republic  of
Lithuania".   This   Seimas   Resolution  was  published  in  the
official  gazette  "Valstybės  žinios" on 17 March 2004 (Official
Gazette Valstybės žinios, 2004, No. 41-1325).
     2.  The  16 March 2004 Seimas Resolution "On the Application
to  the  Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania with a
Petition  Requesting  to  investigate  whether  the Decree of the
President   of   the  Republic  'On  the  Proposal  to  Institute
Impeachment  Proceedings  Against the Member of the Seimas of the
Republic  of  Lithuania  Artūras  Paulauskas'  Is Not in Conflict
with   the   Constitution  of  the  Republic  of  Lithuania"  was
received at the Constitutional Court on 17 March 2004.

     The Constitutional Court
                           holds that:                           

     1.  Item  1  of  Paragraph 3 of Article 66 of the Law on the
Constitutional  Court  provides  that  a  duplicate  of the whole
text  of  the  disputed  legal  act  shall  be  attached  to  the
petition.  Under  Item 15 of Section 1 of Chapter VI of the Rules
of  the  Constitutional Court, the text published in the official
gazette   "Valstybės   žinios"   is   to  be  considered  such  a
duplicate.
     Paragraph  5  of Article 66 of the Law on the Constitutional
Court   provides   that  the  petition  and  attachments  thereto
specified  in  Paragraph  3 of this article shall be submitted to
the Constitutional Court along with 30 copies of the duplicate.
     2.  There  is  not any duplicate of the whole text of Decree
of  the  President  of  the  Republic No. 397 "On the Proposal to
Institute  Impeachment  Proceedings  Against  the  Member  of the
Seimas  of  the  Republic  of Lithuania Artūras Paulauskas" of 12
March   2004   attached   to   the   Seimas  Resolution  "On  the
Application  to  the  Constitutional  Court  of  the  Republic of
Lithuania  with  a Petition Requesting to investigate whether the
Decree  of  the  President  of  the  Republic 'On the Proposal to
Institute  Impeachment  Proceedings  Against  the  Member  of the
Seimas  of  the  Republic of Lithuania Artūras Paulauskas' Is Not
in   Conflict   with   the   Constitution   of  the  Republic  of
Lithuania",  which  was received at the Constitutional Court, nor
are there 30 copies of the duplicate of the disputed legal act.
     The  petition  set forth in the 16 March 2004 Resolution "On
the  Application  to  the Constitutional Court of the Republic of
Lithuania  with  a Petition Requesting to investigate whether the
Decree  of  the  President  of  the  Republic 'On the Proposal to
Institute  Impeachment  Proceedings  Against  the  Member  of the
Seimas  of  the  Republic of Lithuania Artūras Paulauskas' Is Not
in  Conflict  with the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania"
of  the  Seimas,  the  petitioner, does not meet the requirements
of  Item  1  of  Paragraph 3 of Article 66 and Paragraph 5 of the
same article of the Law on the Constitutional Court.
     3.   Subsequent   to   Article   70   of   the  Law  on  the
Constitutional   Court,   in   the   case   that  a  petition  or
attachments  thereto  fail  to  comply  with the requirements set
forth  in  Article 66 of this law, the petition must be returned.
Paragraph  2  of  Article  70  of  the  Law on the Constitutional
Court  provides  that  the  return  of  a petition shall not take
away  the  right  to  apply to the Constitutional Court according
to  the  common  procedure  after  removal  of  the  deficiencies
thereof.

     Conforming  to  Article  106  of  the  Constitution  of  the
Republic  of  Lithuania, Paragraph 1 of Article 26 and Article 70
of  the  Law  on  the  Constitutional  Court  of  the Republic of
Lithuania,   the   Constitutional   Court   of  the  Republic  of
Lithuania has adopted the following
  
                            decision:                            

     To  return  the  petition  to  the Seimas of the Republic of
Lithuania,  the  petitioner,  set  forth  in  the  16  March 2004
Resolution  "On  the  Application  to the Constitutional Court of
the   Republic   of  Lithuania  with  a  Petition  Requesting  to
investigate  whether  the Decree of the President of the Republic
'On  the  Proposal  to  Institute Impeachment Proceedings Against
the  Member  of  the  Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania Artūras
Paulauskas'  Is  Not  in  Conflict  with  the Constitution of the
Republic   of  Lithuania"  of  the  Seimas  of  the  Republic  of
Lithuania.
  
Justices of the Constitutional Court:	Armanas Abramavičius
					Egidijus Jarašiūnas
					Egidijus Kūris
					Kęstutis Lapinskas
					Zenonas Namavičius
					Augustinas Normantas
					Jonas Prapiestis
					Vytautas Sinkevičius
					Stasys Stačiokas