Lietuviškai
           THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF           
                            LITHUANIA                            

                            DECISION                             
     ON   THE  REQUEST  TO  DETERMINE  WHETHER  THE  REPUBLIC  OF
LITHUANIA   LAW   "ON   THE   PROCEDURE   OF  REORGANISATION  AND
LIQUIDATION  OF  ESTABLISHMENTS  OF  CULTURE"  (THE  13 JUNE 1995
WORDING  OF  LAW  NO. I-947) IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 2 OF
ARTICLE  120  OF  THE  CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA,
PARAGRAPH  1  OF  ARTICLE  3,  PARAGRAPHS  2  AND 5 OF ARTICLE 4,
PARAGRAPH  1  OF  ARTICLE  6  OF  THE  EUROPEAN  CHARTER OF LOCAL
SELF-GOVERNMENT,  AND  WHETHER  ITEM  2.4  OF  RESOLUTION  OF THE
GOVERNMENT  OF  THE  REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA NO. 1320 "ON THE HOUSE
OF  THE  SIGNATORIES  TO  THE  LITHUANIAN  INDEPENDENCE  AND  THE
PALACE   OF  LITHUANIAN  ARTISTS"  OF  28  NOVEMBER  1997  IS  IN
COMPLIANCE  WITH  PARAGRAPH  2 OF ARTICLE 120 OF THE CONSTITUTION
OF   THE  REPUBLIC  OF  LITHUANIA,  PARAGRAPH  1  OF  ARTICLE  3,
PARAGRAPHS  2  AND  5  OF  ARTICLE 4, PARAGRAPH 1 OF ARTICLE 6 OF
THE  EUROPEAN  CHARTER  OF  LOCAL  SELF-GOVERNMENT  AND ITEM 4 OF
PARAGRAPH  1  OF  ARTICLE 4 AND ITEM 13 OF PARAGRAPH 1 OF ARTICLE
6 OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA LAW ON LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT

                          25 April 2002                          
                             Vilnius                             

     The  Constitutional  Court  of  the  Republic  of Lithuania,
composed  of  the  Judges  of  the  Constitutional  Court Armanas
Abramavičius,   Egidijus  Jarašiūnas,  Egidijus  Kūris,  Kęstutis
Lapinskas,   Zenonas   Namavičius,  Augustinas  Normantas,  Jonas
Prapiestis, Vytautas Sinkevičius, and Stasys Stačiokas,
     with the secretary of the hearing-Daiva Pitrėnaitė,
     in  the  procedural  sitting  of  the  Constitutional  Court
considered  the  report  made  by  the  judge  Zenonas Namavičius
concerning  the  petition of the petitioner, the Vilnius Regional
Administrative   Court,   requesting  to  determine  whether  the
Republic  of  Lithuania  Law  "On the Procedure of Reorganisation
and  Liquidation  of Establishments of Culture" (the 13 June 1995
wording  of  Law No. I-947) was in compliance with Paragraph 2 of
Article  120  of  the  Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania,
Paragraph  1  of  Article  3,  Paragraphs  2  and 5 of Article 4,
Paragraph  1  of  Article  6  of  the  European  Charter of Local
Self-government,  and  whether  Item  2.4  of  Resolution  of the
Government  of  the  Republic of Lithuania No. 1320 "On the House
of  the  Signatories  to  the  Lithuanian  Independence  and  the
Palace  of  Lithuanian  Artists"  of  28  November  1997  was  in
compliance  with  Paragraph  2 of Article 120 of the Constitution
of   the  Republic  of  Lithuania,  Paragraph  1  of  Article  3,
Paragraphs  2  and  5  of  Article 4, Paragraph 1 of Article 6 of
the  European  Charter  of  Local  Self-government  and Item 4 of
Paragraph  1  of  Article 4 and Item 13 of Paragraph 1 of Article
6 of the Republic of Lithuania Law on Local Self-government.

     The Constitutional Court
                        has established:                         

     1.  The  petitioner,  the  Vilnius  Regional  Administrative
Court,  was  investigating  an  administrative case. By its order
of  15  April 2002, the said court suspended the investigation of
the  case  and addressed the Constitutional Court with a petition
requesting  to  determine  whether  the Republic of Lithuania Law
"On   the   Procedure   of   Reorganisation  and  Liquidation  of
Establishments  of  Culture" (the 13 June 1995 wording of Law No.
I-947)  was  in compliance with Paragraph 2 of Article 120 of the
Constitution,  Paragraph  1  of  Article 3, Paragraphs 2 and 5 of
Article  4,  Paragraph  1 of Article 6 of the European Charter of
Local  Self-government,  and  whether  Item  2.4 of Resolution of
the  Government  of  the  Republic  of Lithuania No. 1320 "On the
House  of  the Signatories to the Lithuanian Independence and the
House   of  Lithuanian  Artists"  of  28  November  1997  was  in
compliance  with  Paragraph 2 of Article 120 of the Constitution,
Paragraph  1  of  Article  3,  Paragraphs  2  and 5 of Article 4,
Paragraph  1  of  Article  6  of  the  European  Charter of Local
Self-government  and  Item 4 of Paragraph 1 of Article 4 and Item
13   of   Paragraph   1   of  Article  6  of  the  Law  on  Local
Self-government.

     The Constitutional Court
                           holds that:                           

     Paragraph 3 of Article 138 of the Constitution provides:
     "International  agreements  which are ratified by the Seimas
of  the  Republic  of  Lithuania shall be the constituent part of
the legal system of the Republic of Lithuania."
     Construing   this   provision   of   the  Constitution,  the
Constitutional  Court  has  held  that it means that the treaties
ratified   by   the   Seimas  shall  acquire  the  force  of  law
(Constitutional Court ruling of 17 October 1995).
     Under  Paragraph  1  of Article 105 of the Constitution, the
Constitutional   Court   shall   consider   and  adopt  decisions
concerning  the  conformity  of laws of the Republic of Lithuania
and  legal  acts  adopted  by the Seimas with the Constitution of
the  Republic  of  Lithuania.  Thus,  under the Constitution, the
Constitutional  Court  shall not consider the conformity of a law
with a legal act having the force of the law.

     Conforming  to  Article  28  and  Item  2  of Paragraph 1 of
Article   69   of   the   Republic   of   Lithuania  Law  on  the
Constitutional  Court,  the  Constitutional Court of the Republic
of Lithuania has adopted the following
  
                            decision:                            

     1.   To   accept   the  petition  of  the  Vilnius  Regional
Administrative  Court  for  consideration as to the compliance of
the   Republic   of   Lithuania   Law   "On   the   Procedure  of
Reorganisation  and  Liquidation  of  Establishments  of Culture"
(the  13  June 1995 wording of Law No. I-947) with Paragraph 2 of
Article  120  of  the  Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania,
and  the  compliance  of Item 2.4 of Resolution of the Government
of  the  Republic  of  Lithuania  No.  1320  "On the House of the
Signatories  to  the  Lithuanian  Independence  and the Palace of
Lithuanian  Artists"  of  28  November  1997  with Paragraph 2 of
Article  120  of  the  Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania,
Paragraph  1  of  Article  3,  Paragraphs  2  and 5 of Article 4,
Paragraph  1  of  Article  6  of  the  European  Charter of Local
Self-government  and  Item 4 of Paragraph 1 of Article 4 and Item
13  of  Paragraph 1 of Article 6 of the Republic of Lithuania Law
on Local Self-government.
     2.  To  refuse  to  consider  the  petition  of  the Vilnius
Regional  Administrative  Court requesting to investigate whether
the   Republic   of   Lithuania   Law   "On   the   Procedure  of
Reorganisation  and  Liquidation  of  Establishments  of Culture"
(the  13  June  1995  wording  of Law No. I-947) is in compliance
with  Paragraph  1 of Article 3, Paragraphs 2 and 5 of Article 4,
Paragraph  1  of  Article  6  of  the  European  Charter of Local
Self-government.