Lietuviškai

                   THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF                   
                    THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA                    

                         D E C I S I O N                         

          On the petition of the Kaunas Regional Court           
         requesting investigation into the compliance of         
           the provision of Seimas of the Republic of            
       Lithuania Resolution No. VIII-206 "On Amending the        
         Resolution of the Supreme Council 'On the Entry         
         into Force of the Republic of Lithuania Law on          
         Privatisation of Apartments'" of 29 April 1997          
            whereby the Republic of Lithuania Law on             
       Privatisation of Apartments shall be valid until 1        
        July 1998 and the provision of the second chapter        
        of the 12 October 2000 Republic of Lithuania Law         
            "On Supplementing the Law on Enabling the            
           Population of the Republic of Lithuania in            
         Providing Themselves with Dwelling Places with          
           Article 13 and Amending Articles 14 and 18            
        thereof, as well as on the Recognition of the Law        
        on Privatisation of Apartments and the Resolution        
       of the Supreme Council-Reconstituent Seimas of the        
        Republic of Lithuania 'On the Entry into Force of        
        the Republic of Lithuania Law on Privatisation of        
        Apartments' as Null and Void" whereby the Law on         
        Privatisation of Apartments is recognised as null        
        and void with the Constitution of the Republic of        
                            Lithuania                            

                      Vilnius, 3 April 2001                      

     The  Constitutional  Court  of  the  Republic  of Lithuania,
composed  of  the  Judges  of  the  Constitutional Court Egidijus
Jarašiūnas,   Egidijus   Kūris,   Zigmas   Levickis,   Augustinas
Normantas,   Vladas   Pavilonis,   Jonas   Prapiestis,   Vytautas
Sinkevičius, Stasys Stačiokas, and Teodora Staugaitienė,
     with the secretary of the hearing-Daiva Pitrėnaitė,
     in  the  procedural  sitting  of  the  Constitutional  Court
considered   a   report   of   Egidijus   Kūris,   Judge  of  the
Constitutional    Court,    concerning    a   petition   of   the
petitioner-the     Kaunas     Regional    Court-requesting    the
Constitutional  Court  to  investigate if the provision of Seimas
of   the  Republic  of  Lithuania  Resolution  No.  VIII-206  "On
Amending  the  Resolution  of  the  Supreme Council 'On the Entry
into  Force  of the Republic of Lithuania Law on Privatisation of
Apartments'"  of  29 April 1997 whereby the Republic of Lithuania
Law  on  Privatisation  of Apartments shall be valid until 1 July
1998  and  the  provision of the second chapter of the 12 October
2000  Republic  of  Lithuania  Law  "On  Supplementing the Law on
Enabling   the   Population  of  the  Republic  of  Lithuania  in
Providing  Themselves  with  Dwelling  Places with Article 13 and
Amending   Articles  14  and  18  thereof,  as  well  as  on  the
Recognition  of  the  Law  on Privatisation of Apartments and the
Resolution  of  the  Supreme  Council-Reconstituent Seimas of the
Republic  of  Lithuania  'On the Entry into Force of the Republic
of  Lithuania  Law  on  Privatisation  of Apartments' as Null and
Void"   whereby   the  Law  on  Privatisation  of  Apartments  is
recognised  as  null  and void are in compliance with Paragraph 1
of Article 29 of the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania.

     The Constitutional Court
                        has established:                         

     1.    The    petitioner-the    Kaunas   Regional   Court-was
investigating  a  civil  case.  By its ruling of 26 January 2001,
it  suspended  the  investigation of the case and appealed to the
Constitutional  Court  with the petition requesting investigation
into  the  compliance  of the provision of Seimas of the Republic
of   Lithuania   Resolution   No.   VIII-206   "On  Amending  the
Resolution  of  the  Supreme  Council 'On the Entry into Force of
the  Republic  of  Lithuania Law on Privatisation of Apartments'"
of  29  April  1997 (Official Gazette Valstybės žinios, 1997, No.
39-955;  hereinafter  also  referred  to as the Seimas resolution
of  29  April  1997)  whereby  the  Republic  of Lithuania Law on
Privatisation  of  Apartments  shall  be  valid until 1 July 1998
and  the  provision  of the second chapter of the 12 October 2000
Republic  of  Lithuania Law "On Supplementing the Law on Enabling
the   Population  of  the  Republic  of  Lithuania  in  Providing
Themselves  with  Dwelling  Places  with  Article 13 and Amending
Articles  14  and  18  thereof,  as well as on the Recognition of
the  Law  on  Privatisation  of  Apartments and the Resolution of
the  Supreme  Council-Reconstituent  Seimas  of  the  Republic of
Lithuania  'On  the Entry into Force of the Republic of Lithuania
Law  on  Privatisation of Apartments' as Null and Void" (Official
Gazette   Valstybės   žinios,   No.   92-2874;  hereinafter  also
referred  to  as  the  law of 12 October 2000) whereby the Law on
Privatisation  of  Apartments is recognised as null and void with
the  provisions  of  equality of citizens entrenched in Paragraph
1 of Article 29 of the Constitution.
     2. The request is based on the following arguments.
     In  the  aforementioned case investigated by the petitioner,
the  plaintiffs  requested to satisfy their claim to obligate the
respondent  to  permit  them  to  privatise  their  rooms  in the
hostels   in   pursuance   with   the  Law  on  Privatisation  of
Apartments  which  was then in force. The claim was complied with
by  the  Kaunas  local court decision of 28 September 2000. Until
the  termination  of the judicial procedure, the plaintiffs could
not  make  use of the right established in Paragraph 1 of Article
2  and  Paragraph  2  of Article 5 of the Law on Privatisation of
Apartments.  The  petitioner  points  out that other persons have
made  use  of  this  right  by  acquiring on favourable terms the
rented residential premises.
     Before  the  decision  was  adopted in the said case, it had
been  established  by the Seimas resolution of 29 April 1997 that
the  Law  on  Privatisation  of Apartments shall be valid until 1
July  1998.  The  said  Seimas resolution had abolished the right
established  in  Paragraph  1  of  Article  2  and Paragraph 2 of
Article  5  of  the  Law on Privatisation of Apartments. Besides,
it  was  established  in  the  second  chapter  of  the law of 12
October  2000  that  the Law on Privatisation of Apartments shall
be recognised as null and void.
     Paragraph  1  of  Article  29  of  the Constitution provides
that  all  persons  shall be equal before the law, the court, and
other  state  institutions  and  officers.  The petitioner doubts
whether  the  provision of the Seimas resolution of 29 April 1997
that  the  Law  on  Privatisation  of  Apartments  shall be valid
until  1  July  1998  and  the provision of the second chapter of
the  law  of  12 October 2000 whereby the Law on Privatisation of
Apartments  is  recognised  as  null  and  void are in compliance
with Paragraph 1 of Article 29 of the Constitution.

     The Constitutional Court
                           holds that:                           

     1.  Article  1  of  the  Seimas  resolution of 29 April 1997
provides:
     "To  amend  Item  1 of the Resolution of the Supreme Council
'On  the  Entry  into  Force  of the Republic of Lithuania Law on
Privatisation  of  Apartments'  and,  instead of the date '1 July
1997',  to  enter  the  date  '1  July 1998' and to set down this
item as follows:
     '1.  To  establish  that  the  Republic  of Lithuania Law on
Privatisation  of  Apartments  shall  come  into force on 30 June
1991  and  shall  be  valid  until  1  July  1998  except for the
tenants  who  dwell  in  the  residential  premises  specified in
Paragraphs  3,  4 and 5 of Article 2 of the Republic of Lithuania
Law on Privatisation of Apartments.'"
     The  petitioner  has doubts concerning the compliance of not
whole  Article  1  of  the Seimas resolution of 1997 but only its
provision  that  the  Law on Privatisation of Apartments shall be
valid  until  1  July  1998 with Paragraph 1 of Article 29 of the
Constitution.
     2.  Article  1  of  the  second  chapter  of  the  law of 12
October   2000  provides  that  the  Resolution  of  the  Supreme
Council-Reconstituent  Seimas  "On  the  Entry  into Force of the
Republic  of  Lithuania  Law  on Privatisation of Apartments" and
the  Law  on  Privatisation  of Apartments shall be recognised as
null and void.
     The  petitioner  requests  the  Court  to investigate if the
provision  of  the  second  chapter of the law of 12 October 2000
whereby  the  Law on Privatisation of Apartments is recognised as
null  and  void  is  in compliance with Paragraph 1 of Article 29
of the Constitution.
     3.  It  is  clear  from  the  arguments  set  down  that the
petitioner   confronted  the  constitutionality  problem  of  the
disputed  provisions  when  it  was  considering  if  in the case
investigated  by  the  petitioner the disputed legal acts as well
as the Law on Privatisation of Apartments must be applied.
     It  was  held  in  the  Constitutional  Court decision of 11
July  1994  that  "interpretation  of the essence of a legal norm
is  a  duty  of  the  state  institution  which  applies the law.
Neither  the  Constitution  nor  the  Law  on  the Constitutional
Court  grants  the right to the Constitutional Court to interpret
application  of  laws,  therefore consideration of such a request
is  not  within  the  jurisdiction  of the Constitutional Court".
The   Constitutional   Court   does  not  consider  questions  of
application  of  law, while doubts concerning application of laws
must  be  removed  by  courts  themselves  by construction of the
applicable  norms  (Constitutional  Court  decision  of  11  July
1994, ruling of 11 January 2001).
     Under  Item  2  of  Paragraph  1 of Article 69 of the Law on
the  Constitutional  Court, the Constitutional Court shall refuse
to    consider    petitions    for   the   examination   of   the
constitutionality   of  a  legal  act  by  its  decision  if  the
examination   of   the   petition   does   not   fall  under  the
jurisdiction of the Constitutional Court.

     Conforming  to  Article  28  and  Item  2  of Paragraph 1 of
Article   69   of   the   Republic   of   Lithuania  Law  on  the
Constitutional  Court,  the  Constitutional Court of the Republic
of Lithuania has adopted the following

                            decision:                            

     To  refuse  to  consider the petition of the Kaunas Regional
Court   requesting  investigation  into  the  compliance  of  the
provision  of  Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania Resolution No.
VIII-206  "On  Amending the Resolution of the Supreme Council 'On
the  Entry  into  Force  of  the  Republic  of  Lithuania  Law on
Privatisation  of  Apartments'"  of  29  April  1997  whereby the
Republic  of  Lithuania  Law on Privatisation of Apartments shall
be  valid  until  1  July  1998  and  the provision of the second
chapter  of  the  12  October  2000 Republic of Lithuania Law "On
Supplementing   the   Law  on  Enabling  the  Population  of  the
Republic  of  Lithuania  in  Providing  Themselves  with Dwelling
Places  with  Article 13 and Amending Articles 14 and 18 thereof,
as  well  as  on  the  Recognition of the Law on Privatisation of
Apartments     and     the     Resolution    of    the    Supreme
Council-Reconstituent  Seimas  of  the  Republic of Lithuania 'On
the  Entry  into  Force  of  the  Republic  of  Lithuania  Law on
Privatisation  of  Apartments'  as Null and Void" whereby the Law
on  Privatisation  of  Apartments  is recognised as null and void
with  Paragraph  1  of  Article  29  of  the  Constitution of the
Republic of Lithuania.