Lietuviškai
Case No. 20/98
THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF
THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA
Decision on the request of the College of Civil
Cases of the Vilnius Regional Court to investigate
whether Part 3 of Article 476 of the Republic of
Lithuania Code of Civil Proceedings is in
compliance with the Constitution of the Republic
of Lithuania
Vilnius, 9 October 1998
The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania,
composed of the Judges of the Constitutional Court Egidijus
Jara?i?nas, Kæstutis Lapinskas, Zigmas Levickis, Augustinas
Normantas, Vladas Pavilonis, Jonas Prapiestis, Pranas Vytautas
Rasimavi?ius, Teodora Staugaitien?, and Juozas ?ilys,
with the secretary of the sitting-Daiva Pitr?nait?,
in the organisational sitting of the Constitutional Court
has discussed the issue of refusal to examine the petition
requesting to investigate the compliance of the legal act to
the Constitution.
The Constitutional Court
has established:
The petitioner-the College of Civil Cases of the Vilnius
Regional Court-requests to investigate whether Part 3 of
Article 476 of the Republic of Lithuania Code of Civil
Proceedings (hereinafter referred to as the CCP) is in
compliance with Article 23 of the Constitution of the Republic
of Lithuania.
The Constitutional Court
holds that:
On 7 September 1998, the Constitutional Court investigated
Case No. 1/98 subsequent to the petition submitted to the Court
by the petitioner-the Alytus Regional District Court-requesting
to investigate if Part 3 of Article 476 of the CCP was in
conformity to Article 23 of the Constitution. In its ruling of
24 September 1998 the Constitutional Court recognised that the
part of the norm of Part 3 of Article 476 of the CCP, wherein
it is established that in the case that one has, under
cassation procedure, repealed decisions regarding recovery of
sums of money pursuant to the requirements arising from legal
labour relations, reversal of the implementation of the said
decisions shall be permitted only in the case that the repealed
decision was based on the false evidence of the plaintiff or
forged documents presented by the latter, is in compliance with
the Constitution.
The fact that the compliance of the legal act indicated in
the petition of the College of Civil Cases of the Vilnius
Regional Court has already been investigated at the
Constitutional Court and the ruling of the Constitutional Court
on this issue remains effective, constitutes the grounds for
the Constitutional Court to refuse, by its decision, to examine
the petition requesting to investigate the compliance of Part 3
of Article 476 of the CCP with the Constitution.
Conforming to Article 28 and Item 3 of Part 1 of Article
69 of the Republic of Lithuania Law on the Constitutional
Court, the Constitutional Court has adopted the following
decision:
To refuse to examine the petition requesting to
investigate the compliance of the legal act to the
Constitution.
Judges of the Constitutional Court:
Egidijus Jarašiūnas
Kęstutis Lapinskas
Zigmas Levickis
Augustinas Normantas
Vladas Pavilonis
Jonas Prapiestis
Pranas Vytautas Rasimavičius
Teodora Staugaitienė
Juozas Žilys