Lietuviškai

                   THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF                   
                    THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA                    

                           R U L I N G                           

     On  the  compliance of item 2. 2. 2 of the Government of the
Republic  of  Lithuania  Resolution  "On  appending  and  partial
amending  of  some  resolutions of the Government of the Republic
of   Lithuania  concerning  privatization  of  apartments"  of  3
September  1993  with  the  Law  of  the Republic of Lithuania on
Privatization of Apartments

                    3 November 1994, Vilnius                     

     The  Constitutional  Court  of  the  Republic  of Lithuania,
composed  from  the Justices of the Constitutional Court Algirdas
Gailiūnas,    Kęstutis   Lapinskas,   Zigmas   Levickis,   Vladas
Pavilonis,   Pranas   Vytautas  Rasimavičius,  Stasys  Stačiokas,
Teodora Staugaitienė, Stasys Šedbaras and Juozas Žilys,
     the secretary of the hearing - Rolanda Stimbirytė,
     representatives  of  the party concerned - Irena Butrimienė,
deputy   Director  of  Municipal  Economy  and  Public  Utilities
Department   under   the   Ministry  of  Construction  and  Urban
Development,
     pursuant  to  Part 1, Article 102 of the Constitution of the
Republic  of  Lithuania  and  Part 1, Article 1 of the Law on the
Constitutional  Court  of  the  Republic  of  Lithuania,  in  its
public  hearing  of  27  October 1994 conducted the investigation
of  Case  No 16/94 subsequent to the petition submitted by Kaunas
District  Court  requesting to investigate if item 2. 2. 2 of the
Government  Resolution  "On  appending  and  partial  amending of
some resolutions of the
     Government   of   the   Republic   of  Lithuania  concerning
privatization   of   apartments"   of  3  September  1993  is  in
compliance   with  the  Law  of  the  Republic  of  Lithuania  on
Privatization of Apartments
  
     The Constitutional Court
     has established:

                               1.                                
     The  petitioner  -  Kaunas  District  Court  on  16 May 1994
examined  a  civil  case upon the actions brought to the court by
plaintiffs  N.  Kubilienė and A. Bernotaitė against the defendant
-   State  Institute  of  Design  "Pramprojektas"  pertaining  to
privatization  of  rooms  in  hostels.  The  Court  by its ruling
suspended  the  investigation  of  this  case  and  addressed the
Constitutional  Court  requesting to investigate if the provision
"a  tenant  who  refuses preferential credit for the construction
of  a  cooperative  apartment  may  not  privatize  a  room  in a
hostel"   established   in   item  2.  2.  2  of  the  Government
Resolution   "On   appending   and   partial   amending  of  some
resolutions  of  the  Government  of  the  Republic  of Lithuania
concerning  privatization  of  apartments"  of  3  September 1993
(Official   Gazette   "Valstybės  Žinios"  No  44(29)-897,  1993;
hereinafter   referred   to  as  Resolution  in  dispute)  is  in
conformity with the Law on Privatization of Apartments.
     In   the   request  the  petitioner  specified  that,  under
Article  2  of the Law on Privatization of Apartments, apart from
flats,  rooms  in  hostels  belonging  to  the  state  and public
housing  fund  shall be the object of purchase-sale. According to
the  procedure  established  in Article 3 of said Law, apartments
rented  by  the  persons  who  have  joined  the  house  building
cooperatives,  shall  not  be  privatized in the event that these
persons  are  given preferential credit. The Law on Privatization
of  Apartments  does  not prohibit to privatize rooms in hostels.
The   legislator  in  the  Law  on  Privatization  of  Apartments
distinguished  two  separate notions - "apartments" and "rooms in
hostels".  The  Government  also  distinguished  these notions in
the  Resolution  in  dispute  by  specifying  that  a  tenant who
refuses   preferential   credit   for   the   construction  of  a
cooperative  apartment  may  privatize  the  apartment  he rents.
Pursuant  to  item 2. 2. 2 of the Resolution in dispute, a tenant
may  not  privatize  a hostel room in the procedure prescribed by
the  Law  on  Privatization  on  Apartments  even when he refuses
preferential  credit  given for the construction of a cooperative
apartment.

                               2.                                
     During  preliminary  investigation  of  the  case and in the
court   hearing   the  representatives  of  the  party  concerned
explained  that  the  State's  purpose  was  to attain that every
family  would  have  a  separate  flat  -  either by the right of
ownership  or  by  lease.  Such  a  provision  is  established in
Article  344  of the Civil Code and item 3, Part 1, Article 11 of
the Law of the Republic of Lithuania on Housing.
     On  20  December 1991 the first part of Article 3 of the Law
on  Privatization  of  Apartments  was  appended by item 4, which
contains  the  provision  that, under this Law, apartments rented
by   the   persons  who  received  preferential  credit  for  the
construction  of  a  cooperative apartment or house, shall not be
privatized.  However,  the  Government  taking  into  account the
hardships  in  construction  of  residential houses and crediting
thereof,  also  the  fact  that  a  new  draft Law on Housing was
under  way,  and  striving to reduce the social tension, provided
the   possibility   for  the  tenants  either  to  privatize  the
residential   premises   under   the   Law  on  Privatization  of
Apartments,   i.  e.  in  easy-term  procedure,  or  to  use  the
privileges  given  by  the  State  for  the  construction  of  an
apartment.
     On   15  July  1993,  the  object  of  premises  subject  to
restoration  under  the  Law  on  Privatization of Apartments was
expanded.  In  the  first  part  of  Article 3 of this Law it was
established   that   the   object   of   purchase-sale  shall  be
"residential  houses  belonging  to  the state and public housing
fund,  apartments  in  apartment  houses, apartments and rooms in
hostels   (hereinafter   referred   to  as  "residential  houses,
apartments").  Thereby,  rooms  in  hostels,  i.  e.  residential
premises  that  do  not  meet  the  requirements  of  a  separate
apartment, have also become the object of purchase-sale.
     The  representative  of  the party concerned maintained that
more  than  90  percent  of the residents, who until the adoption
of  said  amendment  to  the  Law  had  expressed  their  will to
privatize   apartments,   had   already   privatized   them.  The
Government  has  also  adopted  other  resolutions concerning the
hostels,   that   were   meant  for  the  implementation  of  the
principle  that  vacant  rooms  in  hostels  must be allotted for
other  inhabitants  residing  in these hostels who are allowed to
make  residential  premises  that  met  the  requirements set for
apartments.  Therefore,  the  Government has not provided for any
possibility  for  persons  living  in hostel rooms and apartments
with  commonly  used kitchens to choose whether to buy the leased
room   in  a  hostel  in  easy-term  procedure  or  to  build  an
apartment using state support.
     In  the  opinion  of  the  party  concerned,  the disputable
provision  of  item  2.  2.  2 of the Government Resolution is in
conformity with the Law on Privatization of Apartments.

	The Constitutional Court
                           holds that:                           

     Upon  the  returning  of the constitutional institute of the
right   of  private  ownership  into  the  legal  system  of  the
Republic  of  Lithuania,  laws  were  adopted on privatization of
state  and  public  housing  fund.  Privatization  of  apartments
became  one  of  the social policies pursued by the State. By way
of   implementing  this  policy,  the  Law  on  Privatization  of
Apartments was adopted which was enforced on 30 June 1991.
     In  the  first part of Article 2 of the Law on Privatization
of   Apartments   it   was   established   that  "the  object  of
purchase-sale   shall   be   residential  houses,  apartments  in
apartment   houses   and  hostels  (hereinafter  referred  to  as
"residential  houses,  apartments")  belonging  to  the state and
public  housing  fund.  Item  2 of the Supreme Council Resolution
"On  the  enforcement  of the Law of the Republic of Lithuania on
Privatization  of  Apartments"  of  30  May  1991  prescribes the
conditions  the  apartments  in  hostels  should meet in order to
privatize  them.  The  conditions  are  as  follows:  "1)separate
apartments   are   turned   (reconstructed)   into   hostels;  2)
residential  premises  used as hostels meet the requirements of a
separate  apartment:  there is a separate entrance, living rooms,
kitchen  and  other  facilities of the apartment that comply with
the  conditions  of  that  locality". In item 2 of the first part
of  Article  3  of  the Law on Privatization of Apartments it was
determined  that,  under this Law, the rooms in hostels would not
be   sold.   These   norms   have   established   the  provisions
restricting   the   rights  of  some  part  of  the  citizens  of
Lithuania  who  live in hostels to privatize residential premises
that fail to meet the requirements set for apartments.
     The  first  part of Article 2 of the Law on Privatisation of
Apartments  was  formulated  in the Republic of Lithuania Law "On
Appending  and  Amending  the Law of the Republic of Lithuania on
Privatization  of  Apartments  of  15  July 1993 in the following
way:  "The  object  of purchase-sale shall be residential houses,
apartments  in  apartment houses, apartments and rooms in hostels
(hereinafter  referred  to as "residential houses, apartments")".
According  to  this  norm,  rooms  in  hostels  may be privatized
except  those  hostels  "which in the procedure prescribed by the
Government  are  allotted  for  the residence of pupils, students
and  doctoral  students  of  secondary  and  vocational  schools,
institutions  of   further   and  higher  education  as  well  as  
rooms  in hostels  belonging  to  the  Lithuanian  Union  of  the
Blind  and Weak-sighted,  the  Lithuania Society for the Deaf and
Lithuanian Society of the Disabled".
     The  first  part of Article 3 of the Law on Privatization of
Apartments   entitled  "Residential  houses  and  apartments  not
subject  to  privatization"  was  on 20 December 1991 appended by
item  4  which  reads:  "4) apartments rented by persons who have
been  allotted  a  plot  of  land  for  the  construction  of  an
individual  residential  house  or  who  have  joined  the  house
building  cooperative,  if  said  persons  are  given preferetial
credits  for  the  construction  of a residential house or if the
plot  of  the land allotted for the construction of an individual
house  is  in the area connected to the main engineering network,
shall not be privatized".
     This   norm   of   the   Law  contains  the  provision  that
apartments  rented  by persons who have joined the house building
cooperatives,  shall  not  be  privatized,  if  said  persons are
given  preferential  credits.  At the same time, Article 4 of the
Law  on  Privatization  of  Apartments was appended by the fourth
part  specifying  that:  "a  tenant,  along  with family members,
upon  the  acquisition of ownership rights to a residential house
or  apartment  they have bought, under this Law may not privatize
another  residential  house  or  apartment".  The  legislator has
interpreted  that  privatization of an apartment is in accordance
with  the  Law  on  Privatization  of Apartments and preferential
credit  given  for  the construction of an apartment are separate
forms  of  state support for its residents and the latter may use
only  one  of  them.  This is confirmed also in Article 12 of the
Law  on  Housing prescribing the right for the citizens to choose
one  of  the  forms  of support - either to exercise the right to
get  preferential  credit  for  the construction or purchase of a
residential   house  or  apartment,  or  to  buy  in  instalments
residential  premises  rented  from  local  governments and state
enterprises.
     However,   the  Law  on  Privatization  of  Apartments  says
nothing  about  the  right  to  privatize apartments belonging to
the  state  and  public  housing  fund to the persons who refused
preferential  credit  offered  to them for the construction of an
apartment.  The  Government  under the 22 January 1992 Resolution
"On   partial  amending  and  appending  the  Government  of  the
Republic  of  Lithuania  Resolution  No  309 of 31 July 1991" has
appended  item  4 by paragraph 5 and established that in the case
that  a  tenant  belongs  to  the  house building cooperative and
refuses  preferential  credit,  he  is  allowed  to privatize the
rented residential house or apartment.
     The  contents  of  general  notion  "apartment" was expanded
upon  the  amendment of the first part of Article 2 of the Law on
Privatization  of  Apartments  by  the  Law  of 15 June 1993. The
notion  has  been  appended  by a new object of purchase sale, i.
e.  rooms  in hostels. By this supplement it has been established
that  preferential  credit  for  the construction of an apartment
is  a  uniform  condition  for  privatization  of  the  apartment
irrespective  of  the  fact  whether  an apartment or a room in a
hostel is bought.
     The   Government,   in  the  Resolution  in  dispute  having
established   the   provision   that   a   tenant   who   refuses
preferential   credit  for  the  construction  of  a  cooperative
apartment   may  not  privatize  a  room  in  hostel,  prescribed
different  conditions  for  privatization of apartments and rooms
in  hostels.  Such different conditions with regard to individual
groups  have  not  been  provided for in the Law on Privatization
of  Apartments,  therefore  this  provision contradicts the first
part of Article 2 and item 4, Part 1, Article 3 of said Law.

     Conforming  to  Article  102  of  the  Constitution  of  the
Republic  of  Lithuania as well as Articles 53, 54, 55, 56 of the
Law  on  the  Constitutional  Court of the Republic of Lithuania,
the Constitutional Court has taken the following
     ruling:
  
     To  recognize  that  the provision that a tenant who refuses
preferential   credit  for  the  construction  of  a  cooperative
apartment  may  not  privatize a room in a hostel, established in
item  2.  2.  2  of  the  Government of the Republic of Lithuania
Resolution  "On  appending  and  amending  of some resolutions of
the   Government   of   the   Republic  of  Lithuania  concerning
privatization  of  apartments"  of  3  September  1993, which has
amended  the  fifth paragraph of item 4 of the Resolution "On the
procedure  for  the  privatization,  sale and use of apartments",
adopted  31  July  1991,  contradicts the first part of Article 2
and  item  4,  Part  1,  Article  3 of the Law of the Republic of
Lithuania on Privatization of Apartments.

     This  Constitutional  Court  ruling is final and not subject
to appeal.
     The  ruling  is  promulgated  on  behalf  of the Republic of
Lithuania.