Lietuviškai

                   THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF 
                    THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA                    

                            DECISION                             

     On  the  compliance  of  the  decision  of the Seimas of the
Republic  of  Lithuania  "On  the  dissolution  of  Vilnius  City
Council  and  some  measures  necessary to improve the activities
in  local  governments",  adopted  on  April  15,  1993, with the
Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania
  
                   17 September 1993, Vilnius                    
  
     The  Constitutional  Court  of  the  Republic  of Lithuania,
composed  from  Justices  of  the  Constitutional  Court Algirdas
Gailiūnas,    Kęstutis   Lapinskas,   Zigmas   Levickis,   Vladas
Pavilonis,   Pranas   Vytautas  Rasimavičius,  Stasys  Stačiokas,
Teodora Staugaitienė, Stasys Šedbaras and Juozas Žilys,
     the secretary of the hearing - Rolanda Stimbirytė,
     the  petitioner  -  Petras Algirdas Miškinis, representative
of the group of the members of the Seimas,
     the  party  concerned  -  the  Seimas representatives Juozas
Bernatonis and Nijolė Šidagienė,
     pursuant  to  Part  1  of Article 102 of the Constitution of
the  Republic  of Lithuania and Part 1 of Article 1 of Law on the
Constitutional  Court,  the Court in its public sitting conducted
the  investigation  of  Case  No  2  subsequent  to  the petition
submitted  to  the  Court  by  a  group  of the Seimas members to
investigate  the  conformity  of  the Seimas decision, adopted on
April  15,  1993  "On the dissolution of Vilnius City Council and
some  measures  necessary  to  improve  the  activities  in local
governments"   with   the   Constitution   of   the  Republic  of
Lithuania.

     The Constitutional Court
                     established:                     
  
     Subsequent  to  the  suggestions  made  by the Government of
the  Republic  of  Lithuania  as well as the Seimas Committee for
local  governments,  the  Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania, by
the  decision  "On  the  commission  for the investigation of the
situation   in  Vilnius  City  Council  and  Board",  adopted  on
February  3,  1993,  formed  the  commission  and obligated it to
present  their  conclusions  to  the Seimas until 31 March, 1993.
The commission has taken two alternative decisions:
     1.   Not   to  recommend  the  Seimas  of  the  Republic  of
Lithuania  to  dissolve  Vilnius  City Council and to resolve the
issue  of  dismissing  guilty  officials  from  their  respective
posts.
     2.  To  take  measures  for  the dissolution of Vilnius City
Council.
     The  Seimas  Committee  for local governments in the sitting
on  22  March, 1993 considered the conclusions of the Commission,
approved  of  them and appealed to the Seimas with the request to
change  the  status  of  the Commission entitling it to the right
of proposing the Seimas to dissolve Vilnius City Council.
     The  Seimas,  pursuant to Article 123 of the Constitution of
the  Republic  of  Lithuania  and  Article  28  of the Law of the
Republic  of  Lithuania  "On the Fundamentals of Local Government
"  as  well  as  the  Law  "On  Direct  Administration  on  Local
Government  Territory"  and  on  the  basis of the conclusions of
the  Commission  formed  to  investigate the situation in Vilnius
City  Council  and  Board, on April 15, 1993 adopted the decision
"On  the  dissolution  of  Vilnius City Council and some measures
necessary  to  improve  the activities in local governments". The
Seimas decided :
     1.  To  dissolve  Vilnius  City  Council of local government
and  to  introduce  direct  administration  on  local  government
territory until the formation of the new Vilnius City Council.
     In  the  time  of  direct administration on local government
territory  to  suspend the validity of the Law of the Republic of
Lithuania on Fundamentals of Local Government.
     2.  In  conformity  with  Part 7 of Article 26 of the Law on
Labour  Contract,  to  dismiss  from  office  Valentinas Šapalas,
chairman  of  Vilnius  City  Council,  Alvydas  Karalius,  deputy
chairman  of  the  Council,  Vytautas  Jasiulaitis,  mayor of the
city and Vidutis Kamaitis, deputy mayor of the city.
     3.  To  charge  the  Government of the Republic of Lithuania
with:
     (1)  immediately  appointing  an  authorised official of the
Government  on  Vilnius  territory  and  resolving  the issues of
transferring to him material values and documentation.
     (2)  approving  the  appointment  and  salary  lists  of the
staff of the Executive body of the authorised official.
     4.  To  organize  elections  to  Vilnius  City Council until
November 28, 1993.
     5.   To   commission   the   Seimas   Committee   for  Local
Governments  of  the  Republic of Lithuania until May 15, 1993 to
draft  the  amendments  to  the laws of the Republic of Lithuania
on   the  Fundamentals  of  Local  Government  and  Elections  to
Councils   of   Local   Government;  and  the  Central  Electoral
Committee  -  to amend the procedure of the elections to councils
of  local  governments prescribed by law and set the date for the
elections to Vilnius City Council.
     6.  To  present to the Prosecutor General of the Republic of
Lithuania  the  material  collected  by  the commission formed to
investigate the situation in Vilnius City Council and Board.
     (Parliamentary  Record  of  the  Seimas  of  the Republic of
Lithuania, 1993, No 13-314).
     The   petitioner   requests   the  Constitutional  Court  to
investigate  the  conformity  of the Seimas decision, dated April
15,  1993,  "On  the dissolution of Vilnius City Council and some
measures   necessary   to   improve   the   activities  in  local
governments"   with   the   Constitution   of   the  Republic  of
Lithuania. The request is based on the following legal motives:
     1.  The  Seimas decision was passed in the violation of Part
2   of  Article  69  of  the  Constitution  of  the  Republic  of
Lithuania,  as  this decision was not adopted by majority vote of
the Seimas members participating in the sitting.
     2.  The  decision  in its contents contradicts the provision
established  in  Part 4 of Article 123 of the Constitution of the
Republic   of   Lithuania   which   does   not  provide  for  the
dissolution  of  the Council of local government. For the purpose
of   regulating   the  fundamentals  and  the  procedure  of  the
introduction  of  direct  administration, the Seimas should enact
a  law  or  coordinate  the  law adopted on December 27, 1992 "On
Direct  Administration  on  Local  Government Territory" with the
Constitution  of  the  Republic of Lithuania. The above mentioned
law  was  adopted  at the time when the Provisional Basic Law was
in force on the territory of the Republic of Lithuania.
     3.  The  Seimas groundlessly relied on Article 28 of the Law
on   the   Fundamentals   of  Local  Government,  promulgated  on
February  12,  1990, as the conclusions of the Commission did not
specify   which   acts   of   the   bodies  of  local  government
contradicted  the  Constitution  of  the  Republic  of Lithuania.
Besides,  there  were no directives on the part of any authorised
State bodies to terminate unlawful actions of the City Council.
     Representatives  of  the  party  concerned, considering that
the  Seimas  decision  is  in compliance with the Constitution of
the  Republic  of  Lithuania, suggested the following explanation
to the Constitutional Court:
     1.  The  Seimas  in  passing  the  decision  relied  on  the
Provisional  Seimas  Statute,  which  regulates  the procedure of
the  enactment  of  the  Seimas  laws  and  other regulations. In
conformity  with  provisions  of  the  Statute, the number of the
Seimas   members   participating   in   the   sitting   shall  be
established   by  the  registration  before  voting.  During  the
adoption  of  Part  1  105  Seimas members were registered, among
them  53  members voted in favour of it, therefore, this part was
adopted  in  full  conformity  with the established in the Seimas
procedure.  The  Seimas  members who observe evident violation of
the  Provisional  Seimas Statute, did not take into consideration
the  procedure  established  in  Article  98 of the Statute which
provides  for  the  right  to demand further investigation of the
case within no less than a week.
     2.   Article   3   of  the  Law  on  the  Procedure  of  the
Enforcement  of  the  Constitution  of  the Republic of Lithuania
establishes  that  provisions  of  the  laws  of  the Republic of
Lithuania   which   determine   the   status   of   the   supreme
institutions  of  State  power and administration of the Republic
of  Lithuania  as  well  as  the  status  of  deputies  of  local
governments  shall  be effective until the elected Seimas decides
otherwise.  In  conformity  with  this  Article the conclusion is
drawn  that  the Law on the Fundamentals of Local Government as a
whole  and  its  Article 28, taken separately, as well as the Law
on  Direct  Administration  on  Local  Government  Territory  are
valid.  It  is established in these laws that the introduction of
direct   administration   on   local   government   territory  is
connected   with   the   dissolution  of  the  Council  of  local
government.  Nevertheless,  the petitioner does not appeal to the
Court  according  to the procedure prescribed by law to prove the
compliance  of  these  laws with the Constitution of the Republic
of Lithuania.
     3.  Article  28  of  the  Law  on  the Fundamentals of Local
Government  provides  for three legal cases of the dissolution of
the   Council   of   local   government.   Each  of  them,  taken
separately,  can  be  a ground for the dissolution of the Council
of  local  government.  The conclusions of the Commission as well
as  their  inseparable  certificates contain data enough to prove
constant  and  gross violations of laws committed by Vilnius City
Council  and  other executive bodies, which disregard the demands
of   State  bodies  to  terminate  unlawful  acts.  Vilnius  City
Council   did   not  exercise  control  over  the  activities  of
executive bodies accountable to it.

     The Constitutional Court
                           holds that:                           

     1.  Pertaining  to  the compliance of the adoption procedure
of  the  decision  of the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania "On
the  dissolution  of  Vilnius  City  Council  and  some  measures
necessary   to  improve  the  activities  in  local  governments"
adopted   on  April  15,  1993,  with  the  Constitution  of  the
Republic of Lithuania.
     Pursuant  to  Point  4 of Part 1 of Article 64 of the Law on
the  Constitutional  Court,  the Court examines a case concerning
the  compliance  of  a  legal  act  with  the Constitution of the
Republic   of  Lithuania  only  according  to  the  procedure  of
adoption which has been specified in the Constitution.
     Article   69   of   the  Constitution  of  the  Republic  of
Lithuania  establishes  the  rules  of  law  enactment. Part 2 of
Article  69  establishes  a universally recognized provision that
laws  shall  be  deemed  adopted  if  the  majority of the Seimas
members  participating  in  the  sitting  vote in favour thereof.
The    Constitution   also   establishes   the   rules   of   the
Constitutional  laws  enactment and amendment or supplementing by
a  majority  vote  of  two  -  thirds  of the total number of the
deputies.  The  Constitution  of  the  Republic of Lithuania does
not  provide  for  other  provisions  concerning  the adoption of
laws  or  other acts of the Seimas. In the adoption of the Seimas
decision  in  dispute  the  general rule established in Part 2 of
Article  69  of the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania had
to be observed.
     The  Seimas  is  given  the right by the Constitution of the
Republic  of  Lithuania  to  establish concrete procedures of law
enactment  in  accordance  with  law. At present these procedures
are  determined  in  the  Provisional  Statute of the Seimas. The
number  of  Seimas  members participating in the sitting is fixed
at  the  beginning  of  the  sitting by way of their registration
or,  upon  the  instruction of the Chairman of the Seimas, during
the  sitting.  Subsequent  to  the  evidence,  the Constitutional
Court  has  drawn  the  conclusions  that the registration of the
Seimas  members  was  conducted  immediately before voting Part 1
of  the  decision  in  dispute. The results of voting showed that
Part  1  of  the  decision  "On  the  dissolution of Vilnius City
Council  and  some  measures  necessary to improve the activities
in  local  governments"  was  adopted by the majority vote of all
the Seimas members participating in the sitting.
     2.  Pertaining  to the compliance of the Seimas decision "On
the  dissolution  of  Vilnius  City  Council  and  some  measures
necessary  to  improve  the activities in local governments" with
Article 123 of the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania.
     Article   152   of  the  Constitution  of  the  Republic  of
Lithuania  prescribes  that  the procedure for the enforcement of
this  Constitution  and  separate  provisions  thereof  shall  be
regulated  by  Law of the Republic of Lithuania "On the Procedure
for  the  Enforcement  of  the  Constitution  of  the Republic of
Lithuania",   which   together   with  the  Constitution  of  the
Republic of Lithuania was adopted by referendum.
     In  compliance  with  Article  3  of this law, provisions of
the  laws  of  the  Republic  of  Lithuania  which  determine the
status   of   the   supreme   institutions  of  State  power  and
administration  of  the  Republic  of  Lithuania  as  well as the
status  of  deputies  and  local  governments  shall be effective
until  the  elected  Seimas  decides otherwise. Therefore, Part 1
of  Article  123 of the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania
entitles  Seimas  to the right to introduce direct administration
on  local  government  territory  in  cases  and according to the
procedures  provided  by  law, that are determined by Law "On the
Fundamentals  of  Local  Government",  12  February, 1990 and Law
"On  Direct  Administration  on  Local  Government Territory", 27
December, 1990.
     Article  2  of  the  Law  of  the  Republic of Lithuania "On
Direct    Administration    on    Local   Government   territory"
establishes  that  direct  administration  is  introduced  on the
dissolution  of  a  respective  local  government Council, on the
release  from  office officials appointed or elected to this post
and  on  the  suspension  of  the  validity  of the laws on local
government.
     The  Seimas  of the Republic of Lithuania is entitled to the
right   to  apply  these  laws,  to  resolve  the  issue  of  the
dissolution  of  the  Council  of  local  government, temporarily
introducing  direct  administration  and  suspending  the laws of
local  government  on  its  territory.  This  procedure  shall be
changed by a new law.
     The  Seimas  of the Republic of Lithuania while adopting the
decision  "On  the  dissolution  of Vilnius City Council and some
measures   necessary   to   improve   the   activities  in  local
governments"   relied   on   Article   28  of  the  Law  "On  the
fundamentals   of   Local  Government"  which  provides  for  the
following  cases  and procedures of the dissolution of Council of
local  government:  if  the  activity  of  the  bodies  of  local
government   contradicts   the  Basic  Law  of  the  Republic  of
Lithuania;  if  the  bodies  of  local government grossly violate
the  laws  of  the Republic of Lithuania or constitutional rights
of  citizens,  disregarding  the  demands of the authorized state
bodies   of  the  Republic  of  Lithuania  to  terminate  illegal
action.  The  Council  of  local government shall be dissolved by
the   motivated  decision  of  the  Seimas  of  the  Republic  of
Lithuania  adopted  on  the basis of the conclusions presented by
the specially formed commission of the deputies of the Seimas.
     The  Commission  formed  to  investigate  the  situation  in
Vilnius  City  Council  and Board stated in their conclusions and
suggestions  that  Vilnius  City  Council  does  not  resolve the
issue  concerning  the  economic  and strategic infrastructure of
the  city,  does  not effectively supervise the activities of the
Board,  does  not  have  the  conception  of  the  city territory
supervision  for  which  reason  the activities of the Council of
People's  Deputies  are  diminished, does not exercise control of
the   process   of  privatization,  constant  violations  of  the
directives   of   the   Government   concerning   the   lease  of
uninhabited  lodging  can  be observed, it rents plots of land on
a   non-competition   basis   and   the   organization   of   the
privatization   of  the  plots  of  land  is  insufficient.  Some
officials  abusing  their  official  position,  have  acquired or
changed  their  flats.  In  the conclusions and suggestions it is
specified  that  Vilnius  City  Council  and  its Board have made
violations  of  the  financial  discipline  in  establishing  the
tariffs  of  housing  maintenance,  did  not ensure the supply of
the  citizens  with  hot  water  according to fixed timetables as
well  as  other  violations  established in certificates No 4, No
5, No 6.
     However,  the  Commission,  having  enumerated all the above
mentioned  violations,  did  not  qualify  them  according to the
provisions  prescribed  in  Part  1  of Article 28 of the Law "On
the  Fundamentals  of  Local Government" as well as did not shape
the   conclusion  concerning  the  dissolution  of  Vilnius  City
Council, presenting the Seimas only two alternative decisions.
     The  Seimas  of  the  Republic  of Lithuania in the decision
"On  the  dissolution  of  Vilnius City Council and some measures
necessary  to  improve  activities  in local governments" did not
specify  legal  motives, i.e. the decision does not specify which
decisions  and  regulations  of  Vilnius  City  Council and local
government  contradict  the  law of the Republic of Lithuania and
the constitutional rights of the citizens.
     The   Seimas,   having  adopted  the  unmotivated  decision,
violated  the  provision  of Part 2 of the Law of the Republic of
Lithuania  "On  the  Fundamentals  of Local Government", which is
based  on  Article  123  of  the  Constitution of the Republic of
Lithuania.

     Pursuant   to   Article  102  of  the  Constitution  of  the
Republic  of  Lithuania  as well as Articles 53, 54, 55 and 56 of
the  Law  on  the  Constitutional Court, the Constitutional Court
has taken the following decision:

     The  Seimas  decision,  adopted  on  April 15, 1993, "On the
dissolution of Vilnius
     City  Council  and  some  measures  necessary to improve the
activities  in  local governments" contradicts Article 123 of the
Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania.

     This  decision  of  the  Constitutional  Court  is final and
shall not be appealed against.
     The  decision  is  promulgated  on behalf of the Republic of
Lithuania.